A Note:

    Doubtless there will be those disturbed by my rash beginnings. But starting mid-sentence, even beyond the crux of a thought is less an experiment than a device. Many have told me with varying parts facticity and frustration (hence this note) that reading my work twice is necessary. Starting mid-sentence and in mid-thought, then, should complete that circuit; and in truth, circuitousness is a major focal point of the argument. Take solace, though, for all the circuits are short.
    Also, beginning in the middle of a thought, and thus making it incomplete, along with omitting many attributes of the characters rendered in each section, is primarily done in appreciation of the wonderfully analytical, broadly referential, and imaginative mind of the reader. Coupling that aptitude with the provocation of the following work will, I hope, provide for some creative, if unexpressed and only imagined, connections, responses, and retorts; which is perhaps the pith of this perhaps Curt Theology.
 

 

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.